Sunday 15 November 2009

A follow-up to 'e and pi'.

One more curious fact, before I leave the subject of those marvellous numbers e and π, at least for now.

            Quantum electrodynamics employs a theoretical coupling constant, instead of the actual, empirical one, which as we know is α = 0.00729735308.  The QED version is called j2 and is exactly equal to 0.01; j = 0.1 is the QED equivalent of electric charge.  (The reason being that α½ = e/√(4πε0ħc) = 0.085424546 is a way of expressing electric charge in dimensionless terms, with ε0 = 1/4π, and ħ and c both equal to 1 in ‘natural units’.)

            It so happens that:

 

mp/me  =  8παφμe/j4  =  1836.152755656 ,

 

where φ is a dimensionless constant, equal to 1.0000005765078.

            We have already seen that

 

mp/me  =  2ζ/2αμe ,

 

and

 

α  =  eξ/12π3μe ,

 

where ζ = 1.0000305692511 and ξ = 1.0000116993595, respectively.

            It is easy to see from this that:

 

4αξφμe/3ζπ4j4  =  1 ,

 

which relates all of the (apparently arbitrary) dimensionless constants to the values of α, μe, j and π.  (Interestingly, e disappears.)

            The one constant we have left is the largest of them, κ = 1.000249044275, which appeared, it will be recalled, in the equation:

 

mn/me  =  2κ/2α .

 

Simple re-arranging gives us

 

  =  2κme/mn ,

 

and substituting in the above, we have

 

2eκξφμeme/3ζπ2j4mn  =  1 ,

 

and so e makes its re-appearance here.

            The expression κξφ/ζ = 1.0002307469, which constant I shall label η.  Ergo, the above may be re-written:

 

2eημeme/2j4mn  =  1 ,

 

or:

 

mn/me  =  2eημe/3π2j4  =  1838.68366066 .

These results regarding the proton-electron and neutron-electron mass ratios are quite remarkable.  I have known about them for some time, but I have been unable to interest the scientific community in either of them, because they do not fit into any of the existing paradigms.  That is unfortunate for me, perhaps, but doubly unfortunate for the scientific community, which is yet again showing how it is apt to be blinded by its own prejudices.

            I may well have more to say about this on another occasion.

 

***

No comments: